I. A. v. O’Malley (D.N.J. Apr. 26, 2024) - mischaracterization of VE testimony, borderline age, RFC, medical opinion 2) The residual functional capacity

2)  The residual functional capacity finding is not supported by substantial evidence

4) The ALJ’s finding that Plaintiff can return to his past relevant work as a security officer and security guard are not supported by substantial evidence

Medical opinions – supportability

The Rulings are at your fingertips

Briefs for purchase: Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment

I. A. v. O’Malley (D.N.J. Apr. 26, 2024) - mischaracterization of VE testimony, borderline age, RFC, medical opinion 2) The residual functional capacityI. A. v. OMalley, Case No. 1: 23 20999 RBK (D. N. J. Apr. 26, 2024) (Order by U. S. District Judge Robert B. Kugler) Briefs for purchase: Plaintiffs Brief and remand order Topics addressed: RFC required findings RFC lack of support for findings Age categories mechanical application Vocational testimony mischaracterization of record Remand for an award of benefits delay Rulings addressed: Social Security Ruling 96 8p Social Security Ruling 96 9p Social