![[William N.] v. Kijakazi (E.D. Mo. Mar. 21, 2022) - migraine headaches, RFC - reliance on outdated assessments of the State agency medical consultants Briefs for purchase: Plaintiff's Motion](https://cdn.shopify.com/s/files/1/0027/8170/8349/files/istockphoto-1405452812-612x612.jpg?v=1715264582)
Pay in 4 interest-free payments of $18.75 Learn more
Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Aug 31 - Sep 5
Briefs for purchase: Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment and Plaintiff's Reply Brief
” Consequently
despite the remand orders
The court also found that the “other clinical findings” that the ALJ found to be inconsistent with the physician’s opinions were insufficient because they were not listed by the ALJ and “in any event
The court cited from decisions in other circuits in observing:
[William N.] v. Kijakazi (E.D. Mo. Mar. 21, 2022) - migraine headaches, RFC - reliance on outdated assessments of the State agency medical consultants Briefs for purchase: Plaintiff's Motion[William N.] v. Kijakazi, No. 4: 20 CV 1422 CDP, 2022 WL 832328 (E. D. Mo. Mar. 21, 2022) (Decision by U. S. District Judge Catherine D. Perry) Briefs Included: Plaintiffs Brief, Plaintiffs Statement of Uncontroverted Facts, and Plaintiffs Reply Brief Topics addressed: Listing medical equivalence ALJ must build an accurate and logical bridge from the evidence to his conclusion RFC lack of support for findings RFC reliance on outdated assessments of
