![[Antonio F.] v. Kijakazi(S.D. Fla. Sept. 16, 2022) - failure to consider mild mental limitations in assessing RFC, new evidence submitted to the AC, subjective complaints 4) Whether the ALJ committed](https://cdn.shopify.com/s/files/1/0027/8170/8349/files/istockphoto-1405452812-612x612_e595491d-e46e-4895-b3ae-c9975afad986.jpg?v=1716419124)
Pay in 4 interest-free payments of $18.75 Learn more
Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Aug 6 - Aug 11
4) Whether the ALJ committed reversible error in failing to ask the vocational witness if his testimony conflicted with the DOT
3) The mental residual functional capacity finding does not properly account for the credited marked limitations in interacting with others
4) Reversal with instructions for payment of benefits is an appropriate remedy
decision and instead
Senior United States District Judge)
[Antonio F.] v. Kijakazi(S.D. Fla. Sept. 16, 2022) - failure to consider mild mental limitations in assessing RFC, new evidence submitted to the AC, subjective complaints 4) Whether the ALJ committed[Antonio F. v. Kijakazi, No. 21 80456 CIV, 2022 WL 17987822 (S. D. Fla. Sept. 16, 2022), on reconsideration, No. 21 CV 80456 BER, 2023 WL 2388657 (S. D. Fla. Jan. 3, 2023) (Decision by U. S. Magistrate Judge Bruce Reinhart, by consent) Briefs for purchase: Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment; Plaintiff's Reply Brief; Plaintiff's Motion for Rehearing; Plaintiff's Reply to Defendant's Response to Plaintiff's Motion for Rehearing Topics addressed:
