Mary G.R. v. O’Malley (S.D. Fla. Feb. 4, 2025) - no past work as performed more than 5 years prior to ALJ decision, sedentary RFC and grids out, government agreed to remand for an award of benefits the court noted that “[w]hile

the court noted that “[w]hile an ALJ may choose to reject a treating physician’s findings when there is good cause

Magistrate Judge Panayotta Augustin-Birch

Subjective symptoms - daily activities need not be objectively verified

the ALJ’s residual functional capacity finding again failed to reflect a proper evaluation of Plaintiff’s urological impairments

” the court concluded that the ALJ erred in assessing the claimant’s RFC and “the case must be remanded

Mary G.R. v. O’Malley (S.D. Fla. Feb. 4, 2025) - no past work as performed more than 5 years prior to ALJ decision, sedentary RFC and grids out, government agreed to remand for an award of benefits the court noted that “[w]hileMary G. R. v. OMalley, No. 2: 24 cv 14219 SMM (S. D. Fla. Feb. 4, 2025) (Order by U. S. Magistrate Judge Shaniek Mills Maynard, by consent) Briefs for purchase: Plaintiffs Brief; e mail to OGC attorney opposing remand for further proceedings and seeking remand for an award of benefits; Order Granting Unopposed Motion to Remand for an award of benefits Topics addressed: Severity standard Past relevant work 5 year rule Weight of treating physician (old