[Angela S.] v. O’Malley (D.N.J. Oct. 24, 2024) - medical opinions, RFC – reliance on ALJ’s lay interpretation of the record, sentence six new evidence remand 4) Whether the ALJ properly

4) Whether the ALJ properly evaluated Plaintiff’s subjective complaints

Yet any mention of Simon’s most serious symptoms is conspicuously missing from the ALJ’s decision

Without some reasonable explanation from the ALJ as to why completing basic household chores is inconsistent with a finding of disability

or substitute our judgment for that of the [Commissioner]

Non-examining physicians v

[Angela S.] v. O’Malley (D.N.J. Oct. 24, 2024) - medical opinions, RFC – reliance on ALJ’s lay interpretation of the record, sentence six new evidence remand 4) Whether the ALJ properly[Angela S.] v. OMalley, No. CV 23 22441 (RK), 2024 WL 4563910 (D. N. J. Oct. 24, 2024) (Decision by U. S. District Judge Robert Kirsch) Briefs for purchase: Plaintiffs Brief, Plaintiffs Reply Brief and court decision Topics addressed: Medical opinions supportability Medical opinions consistency Medical opinions articulation requirements RFC reliance on ALJs lay interpretation of the record Sentence six remands due to new evidence Ruling addressed: